Meeting BaaS and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
Meeting BaaS
Wave
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.