Meeting BaaS and VoicePen are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. VoicePen: Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and VoicePen when capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | VoicePen |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Records and transcribes meetings, lectures, memos, and imported audio/video |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | AI-generated summaries plus 25+ rewrite and reformatting options |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Speaker separation and labeling within transcripts |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Chat-with-your-notes Q&A to extract takeaways and action steps |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Imports from Voice Memos, Zoom recordings, podcasts, YouTube, and files |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Multilingual transcription with offline recording and iCloud sync |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
VoicePen
Choose VoicePen if you need capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations — strengths include native across iphone, ipad, apple watch, and mac with icloud sync.
Meeting BaaS
VoicePen
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while VoicePen is strong for capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.