Meeting BaaS and Transkriptor are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Transkriptor: AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Transkriptor when transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Transkriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio/video files and links |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Direct meeting capture and transcription for Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Speaker diarization that labels individual speakers |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Support for transcription in 100+ languages plus translation |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | AI assistant and AI chat to summarize transcripts and answer questions |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | SRT subtitle export and in-browser transcript editing |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Transkriptor
Choose Transkriptor if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations — strengths include handles many input methods (file upload, link, recording, and live meetings).
Meeting BaaS
Transkriptor
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Transkriptor is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.