Meeting BaaS and spf.io are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. spf.io: AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and spf.io when captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | spf.io |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Automatic live captions and translation in 100+ languages, with translated audio in 70+ |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Projector display of up to four languages plus mobile QR/URL attendee access |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, YouTube, OBS, StreamYard, vMix, and Twitch |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Supervised/edited captioning and bidirectional translation modes |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Vocabulary fine-tuning, custom speech recognition, and adapted translation models |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Optional professional captioners, interpreters, and remote operators as add-ons |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
spf.io
Choose spf.io if you need captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices — strengths include very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio.
Meeting BaaS
spf.io
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while spf.io is strong for captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.