Meeting BaaS and Sonix are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Sonix: Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Sonix when transcribing recorded meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Sonix |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Automated transcription |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | In-browser transcript editor |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Multi-language support |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Translation and subtitles |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Search across transcripts |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Automated transcription |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Sonix
Choose Sonix if you need transcribing recorded meetings — strengths include accurate transcription with strong editing.
Meeting BaaS
Sonix
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Sonix is strong for transcribing recorded meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.