Meeting BaaS and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Access to raw audio, video, and full transcriptsProgrammatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requestsSelf-hosting option with open-source components
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
Standout feature
Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
Team usage
Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts
Speaker identification during transcription
Integrations
Speaker metadata with timestamps
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Languages & capture
Webhooks and MCP server integration
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Best-fit workflow
Self-hosting option with open-source components
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
Best for
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Pros & cons
Meeting BaaS
+ Single API abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots
+ Gives developers raw audio, video, and transcript data
- A developer API, not a ready-to-use end-user app
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
FAQ
Is Meeting BaaS or Shadow better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Meeting BaaS and Shadow compare on price?
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Meeting BaaS and Shadow?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.