Meeting BaaS and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Meeting BaaS
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.