Meeting BaaS and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Meeting BaaS
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.