Meeting BaaS and Notica are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Notica: A mobile-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with action items, calendar sync, and an AI chat over past notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Notica when capturing and summarizing meetings from a phone while on the move matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
A mobile-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with action items, calendar sync, and an AI chat over past notes.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notica is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Notica |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with key points and action items |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Auto bot-join to capture Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | AI chat to query past meeting notes |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Audio file upload for transcript and summary generation |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Google Calendar sync and multi-language support |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Native apps across iOS, iPad, Mac, and web with encryption in transit and at rest |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Notica
Choose Notica if you need capturing and summarizing meetings from a phone while on the move — strengths include mobile-first workflow optimized for users who meet on the go.
Meeting BaaS
Notica
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Notica is strong for capturing and summarizing meetings from a phone while on the move. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notica is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.