Meeting BaaS and Natively are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Natively |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Meeting BaaS
Natively
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.