Meeting BaaS and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Meeting BaaS
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.