Meeting BaaS and Meeting Ink are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting BaaS: French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting BaaS when startups embedding meeting recording into their own products matters most, and Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French developer API (by SAS Spoke) that sends recording bots into Zoom, Meet, and Teams to capture audio, video, and transcripts for building meeting tools.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting BaaS | Meeting Ink |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified API for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Standout feature | Programmatic recording bots via SDKs and HTTP requests | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording |
| Team usage | Access to raw audio, video, and full transcripts | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese |
| Integrations | Speaker metadata with timestamps | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation |
| Languages & capture | Webhooks and MCP server integration | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition |
| Best-fit workflow | Self-hosting option with open-source components | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance |
Meeting BaaS
Choose Meeting BaaS if you need startups embedding meeting recording into their own products — strengths include single api abstracts away platform-specific meeting bots.
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Meeting BaaS
Meeting Ink
It depends on your workflow. Meeting BaaS is strong for startups embedding meeting recording into their own products, while Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting BaaS is a free tier with paid upgrades and Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.