Meeting.ai and Pluely are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting.ai: An AI notetaker that turns online and in-person meetings into transcripts, summaries, mind maps, and action items. Pluely: A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting.ai when summarizing standups, planning sessions, and client meetings matters most, and Pluely when getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI notetaker that turns online and in-person meetings into transcripts, summaries, mind maps, and action items.
A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot.
Meeting.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting.ai | Pluely |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcripts, summaries, and visual mind maps from meetings | Bot-free capture of system audio and microphone for live transcription |
| Standout feature | Live online capture, in-person recording, and uploaded file processing | Always-on-top overlay app for macOS, Windows, and Linux |
| Team usage | Automatic speaker identification | Bring-your-own-key support for many LLMs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Cohere, Ollama, custom) |
| Integrations | Multi-language support including accents and language switching | Multiple speech-to-text providers (Whisper, Deepgram, ElevenLabs, Groq, Azure, and others) |
| Languages & capture | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Lightweight (~10MB) and fast to launch |
| Best-fit workflow | Exports to PDF, image, or text and secure link sharing | Open source under GPL with optional local processing via Ollama |
Meeting.ai
Choose Meeting.ai if you need summarizing standups, planning sessions, and client meetings — strengths include visual mind maps offer an alternative way to organize meeting content.
Pluely
Choose Pluely if you need getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call — strengths include free and open source with fully inspectable code.
Meeting.ai
Pluely
It depends on your workflow. Meeting.ai is strong for summarizing standups, planning sessions, and client meetings, while Pluely is strong for getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades and Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.