Luster and Modjo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Luster: AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Luster when letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls matters most, and Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Luster | Modjo |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI roleplay environment for rehearsing discovery, objection handling, and other high-stakes scenarios | Automatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings |
| Standout feature | Buyer personas configurable by sales stage, persona type, and deal size | AI call scoring and conversation analytics |
| Team usage | EchoIQ live-call analysis that reviews real customer conversations for skill application | Deal-signal detection (expansion, churn risk, competitors) |
| Integrations | Predictive insights that flag rep readiness risk and skill gaps | Automated CRM updates and AI agents |
| Languages & capture | AI-assisted coaching tools for managers to scale feedback | Native Salesforce and HubSpot integration |
| Best-fit workflow | Certification and onboarding workflows for enablement teams | Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II |
Luster
Choose Luster if you need letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls — strengths include connects practice performance with analysis of real live calls rather than roleplay alone.
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
Luster
Modjo
It depends on your workflow. Luster is strong for letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls, while Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades and Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.