Looppanel and TurboScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Looppanel: AI research assistant that records, transcribes and auto-notes user interviews and calls, then organizes insights in a research repository. TurboScribe: Whisper-based web app that transcribes uploaded audio and video files, including meetings, interviews, and podcasts, with speaker labels and subtitle export. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Looppanel when transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests matters most, and TurboScribe when transcribing recorded meetings and interviews into searchable documents matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI research assistant that records, transcribes and auto-notes user interviews and calls, then organizes insights in a research repository.
Whisper-based web app that transcribes uploaded audio and video files, including meetings, interviews, and podcasts, with speaker labels and subtitle export.
Looppanel is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TurboScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Looppanel | TurboScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI note-taker that records and auto-generates notes from interviews and calls | Audio and video transcription powered by the Whisper speech-recognition model |
| Standout feature | Transcription with support for multiple languages | Automatic speaker labeling for multi-participant recordings |
| Team usage | AI thematic analysis to surface patterns across conversations | Transcription and translation across a large set of languages |
| Integrations | AI-assisted tagging based on discussion guides and emerging themes | Export to plain text, DOCX, PDF, and SRT/VTT subtitle formats |
| Languages & capture | Sentiment analysis and automatic highlighting of key moments | Support for long recordings and batch uploads of multiple files |
| Best-fit workflow | Shareable video clips and traceable links back to source recordings | Works with recordings exported from Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet |
Looppanel
Choose Looppanel if you need transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests — strengths include purpose-built for interview transcription plus downstream qualitative analysis.
TurboScribe
Choose TurboScribe if you need transcribing recorded meetings and interviews into searchable documents — strengths include built on the whisper model, which handles varied accents and technical terms reasonably well.
Looppanel
TurboScribe
It depends on your workflow. Looppanel is strong for transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests, while TurboScribe is strong for transcribing recorded meetings and interviews into searchable documents. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Looppanel is a free tier with paid upgrades and TurboScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.