Looppanel and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Looppanel: AI research assistant that records, transcribes and auto-notes user interviews and calls, then organizes insights in a research repository. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Looppanel when transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI research assistant that records, transcribes and auto-notes user interviews and calls, then organizes insights in a research repository.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Looppanel is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Looppanel | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI note-taker that records and auto-generates notes from interviews and calls | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | Transcription with support for multiple languages | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | AI thematic analysis to surface patterns across conversations | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | AI-assisted tagging based on discussion guides and emerging themes | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | Sentiment analysis and automatic highlighting of key moments | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Shareable video clips and traceable links back to source recordings | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Looppanel
Choose Looppanel if you need transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests — strengths include purpose-built for interview transcription plus downstream qualitative analysis.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Looppanel
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Looppanel is strong for transcribing and auto-noting user interviews and usability tests, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Looppanel is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.