Listen Labs and Zeck are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. Zeck: Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and Zeck when preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviewsAutomated key themes, takeaways, and persona generationExecutive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks
Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting.
AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notesAI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussionsAI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews
AI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussions
Standout feature
Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option
AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notes
Team usage
Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes
AI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts
Integrations
Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation
Smart agendas and interactive, mobile-first board updates
Languages & capture
Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks
Pre-vote and digital voting with a centralized automated minutes book
Best-fit workflow
Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription
Real-time commenting across board materials
Best for
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
Zeck
Choose Zeck if you need preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting — strengths include purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes.
Pros & cons
Listen Labs
+ End-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables
+ Large global participant network reduces sourcing effort
- Enterprise positioning may exceed the needs and budgets of small teams
Zeck
+ Purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes
+ Pre-vote and AI summaries shift routine items out of the live meeting
- Positioned more for startups and growth-stage boards than heavily regulated public companies
FAQ
Is Listen Labs or Zeck better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while Zeck is strong for preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Listen Labs and Zeck compare on price?
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Listen Labs and Zeck?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.