Listen Labs and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Listen Labs | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Listen Labs
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.