Listen Labs and OpenWhispr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. OpenWhispr: Open-source, privacy-first voice-to-text desktop app for Mac, Windows, and Linux that also transcribes meetings into AI-organized notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and OpenWhispr when privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
Open-source, privacy-first voice-to-text desktop app for Mac, Windows, and Linux that also transcribes meetings into AI-organized notes.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenWhispr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Listen Labs | OpenWhispr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews | Open-source and auditable, with code published on GitHub |
| Standout feature | Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option | Cross-platform desktop app for macOS, Windows, and Linux |
| Team usage | Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes | Local transcription via bundled Whisper and NVIDIA Parakeet models |
| Integrations | Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation | Bring-your-own-key cloud model option for flexibility |
| Languages & capture | Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks | AI Notepad that turns rough meeting notes plus transcript into structured minutes |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription | Full-text search and AI Chat across captured meetings |
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
OpenWhispr
Choose OpenWhispr if you need privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call — strengths include fully open source, so users can inspect and self-host the code.
Listen Labs
OpenWhispr
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while OpenWhispr is strong for privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenWhispr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.