Listen Labs and OpenOats are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Listen Labs | OpenOats |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews | Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon |
| Standout feature | Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option | Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings |
| Team usage | Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes | Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls |
| Integrations | Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation | Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files |
| Languages & capture | Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks | Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI) |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription | MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application |
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Listen Labs
OpenOats
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.