Listen Labs and Natively are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Listen Labs | Natively |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews | Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline |
| Standout feature | Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option | Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions |
| Team usage | Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes | On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls |
| Integrations | Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation | Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq |
| Languages & capture | Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks | Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription | Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot |
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Listen Labs
Natively
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.