Listen Labs and meetXcc are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Listen Labs: Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Listen Labs when replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews matters most, and meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise AI customer research platform that recruits participants, runs AI-moderated interviews, and delivers executive-ready insight reports.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Listen Labs | meetXcc |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer running personalized video, audio, and text interviews | Bot-free, invisible capture inside Google Meet |
| Standout feature | Global participant recruitment with bring-your-own-audience option | Real-time transcription across many languages |
| Team usage | Stimulus testing with videos, images, and Figma prototypes | AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline |
| Integrations | Automated key themes, takeaways, and persona generation | Mind map generation from meeting content |
| Languages & capture | Executive-ready reports with highlight reels and slide decks | Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 100+ languages with translation and transcription | One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync |
Listen Labs
Choose Listen Labs if you need replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews — strengths include end-to-end automation from recruitment to executive-ready deliverables.
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
Listen Labs
meetXcc
It depends on your workflow. Listen Labs is strong for replacing or supplementing surveys with scalable ai-led customer interviews, while meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Listen Labs is a free tier with paid upgrades and meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.