LexiTranscript and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. LexiTranscript: Taiwan-made AI speech-to-text tool from TaiLexi AI optimized for Traditional Chinese, with meeting transcription and summaries. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist LexiTranscript when producing traditional chinese transcripts and summaries of meetings matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-made AI speech-to-text tool from TaiLexi AI optimized for Traditional Chinese, with meeting transcription and summaries.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
LexiTranscript is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | LexiTranscript | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI speech-to-text optimized for Traditional Chinese and Taiwanese-accented speech | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | Handling of mixed Chinese-and-English audio | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | Speaker identification for multi-person recordings | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | AI proofreading that removes filler words and corrects phrasing | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Automatic personal-data masking and legal-terminology recognition | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | AI-generated summaries of transcripts | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
LexiTranscript
Choose LexiTranscript if you need producing traditional chinese transcripts and summaries of meetings — strengths include strong traditional chinese and taiwan-accent recognition.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
LexiTranscript
Typist
It depends on your workflow. LexiTranscript is strong for producing traditional chinese transcripts and summaries of meetings, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
LexiTranscript is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.