Lark Minutes and ZMEETING are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. ZMEETING: AI meeting-minutes service by Hmcomm that automatically transcribes Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings, identifies speakers, and supports multilingual transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and ZMEETING when automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI meeting-minutes service by Hmcomm that automatically transcribes Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings, identifies speakers, and supports multilingual transcription.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ZMEETING is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | ZMEETING |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Automatic transcription of Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Speaker identification on higher-tier plans |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Multilingual transcription and translation (Japanese, English, and more) |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Custom dictionary for specialized terminology |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Automatic filler-word removal |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Emotion recognition and meeting-atmosphere analysis on upper tiers |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
ZMEETING
Choose ZMEETING if you need automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls — strengths include proprietary speech-recognition technology from a research-derived vendor.
Lark Minutes
ZMEETING
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while ZMEETING is strong for automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and ZMEETING is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.