Lark Minutes and Zeplyn are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Zeplyn: AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Zeplyn when capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting NotesAutomatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcriptsCollaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts
AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs.
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emailsIntegrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google CalendarOne-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts
Recording-free structured note capture from client meetings
Standout feature
AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes
Support for virtual meetings, in-person meetings, and dictations
Team usage
Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emails
Integrations
One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages
One-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Languages & capture
Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping
Pre-meeting smart client summaries and discussion agendas
Best-fit workflow
Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents
Integrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google Calendar
Best for
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Zeplyn
Choose Zeplyn if you need capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings — strengths include built specifically for wealth management workflows.
Pros & cons
Lark Minutes
+ Built into the Lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs
+ Collaborative, searchable transcripts rather than static files
- Tied to the Lark ecosystem rather than offered as a standalone product
Zeplyn
+ Built specifically for wealth management workflows
+ Captures structured financial details and action items, not just raw transcript
- Specialized for financial advisors, limiting fit for other industries
FAQ
Is Lark Minutes or Zeplyn better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Zeplyn is strong for capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Lark Minutes and Zeplyn compare on price?
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Lark Minutes and Zeplyn?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.