Lark Minutes and User Evaluation are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. User Evaluation: AI research workspace that transcribes interviews in dozens of languages and turns them into cited insights, clips, charts, and reports. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and User Evaluation when transcribing and analyzing multilingual research interviews matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI research workspace that transcribes interviews in dozens of languages and turns them into cited insights, clips, charts, and reports.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); User Evaluation is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | User Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Transcription in dozens of languages with speaker labels and custom vocabulary |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Multimodal input support for audio, video, text, PDF, and CSV |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Agentic AI chat that cites evidence and identifies pain points and themes |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Automatic tagging of mentions and visual summaries |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Exportable outputs: MP4 clips, charts, PDF/DOCX reports, and PPTX decks |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Interview scheduling, recording, and live note-taking |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
User Evaluation
Choose User Evaluation if you need transcribing and analyzing multilingual research interviews — strengths include evidence-cited ai analysis keeps insights traceable to sources.
Lark Minutes
User Evaluation
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while User Evaluation is strong for transcribing and analyzing multilingual research interviews. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and User Evaluation is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.