Lark Minutes and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Lark Minutes
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.