Lark Minutes and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Lark Minutes
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.