Lark Minutes and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Skribby |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Lark Minutes
Skribby
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.