Lark Minutes and Scriber GPT are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Scriber GPT: AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Scriber GPT when transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Scriber GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | AI transcription for audio and video across many file formats |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Speaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Subtitle export in SRT plus PDF, DOCX, and TXT |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Translation of transcripts while preserving speaker labels and timestamps |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Dedicated interview and webinar transcription workflows |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Support for 90+ languages |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Scriber GPT
Choose Scriber GPT if you need transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers — strengths include covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output.
Lark Minutes
Scriber GPT
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Scriber GPT is strong for transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.