Lark Minutes and Scrib are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Scrib: India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Scrib when transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Scrib |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Transcription across 22 Indian languages plus 19 global languages, with Hindi-English code-switching support |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | Multiple capture methods: file upload, live microphone recording, link pasting (YouTube, Loom, Drive, Dropbox), and a meeting bot |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Meeting bot that joins Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to transcribe calls automatically |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Automatic speaker recognition with per-speaker labels and timelines |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | AI-generated summaries, chapters, key insights, and action items |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Inline transcript editing with click-to-seek playback |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Scrib
Choose Scrib if you need transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot — strengths include strong coverage of indian languages and hinglish code-switching that many global tools handle less reliably.
Lark Minutes
Scrib
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Scrib is strong for transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.