Lark Minutes and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting NotesAutomatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcriptsCollaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts
AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights.
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email draftsAI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query toolCall scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Lark Minutes
+ Built into the Lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs
+ Collaborative, searchable transcripts rather than static files
- Tied to the Lark ecosystem rather than offered as a standalone product
Rafiki
+ Combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Lark Minutes or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Lark Minutes and Rafiki compare on price?
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Lark Minutes and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.