Lark Minutes and Nyota are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Nyota: AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Nyota when engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Nyota |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Joins and transcribes Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | More than 20 meeting templates for tailored summaries |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Automatic action item and key takeaway extraction |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Searchable archive of past conversations |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Agenda preparation and signal tracking across meetings |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | Sharing to Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, Google Drive and more |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Nyota
Choose Nyota if you need engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs — strengths include template variety tailors summaries to different meeting types.
Lark Minutes
Nyota
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Nyota is strong for engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.