Lark Minutes and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | Notta |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | 58-language transcription |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | AI summaries |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | File upload transcription |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | CRM integrations |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | 58-language transcription |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | AI summaries |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Lark Minutes
Notta
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.