Lark Minutes and MeetingBot are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most, and MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Lark Minutes | MeetingBot |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom |
| Standout feature | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata |
| Team usage | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing |
| Integrations | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS |
| Languages & capture | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM |
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Lark Minutes
MeetingBot
It depends on your workflow. Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings, while MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.