Krisp and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Krisp: AI noise cancellation plus meeting recording, notes and action items Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Krisp when removing background noise on calls matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
AI meeting notes
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Transcription
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Accent conversion
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
AI noise cancellation
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
AI meeting notes
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Krisp
Choose Krisp if you need removing background noise on calls — strengths include best-in-class ai noise, voice, and echo cancellation.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Krisp
+ Best-in-class AI noise, voice, and echo cancellation
+ Works at the device level across virtually any meeting or calling app
- Free plan limits noise cancellation to 60 minutes per day
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Krisp or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Krisp is strong for removing background noise on calls, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Krisp and Tana compare on price?
Krisp is from $8/mo and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Krisp and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Krisp vs Tana: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo