Krisp and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Krisp: AI noise, voice, and echo cancellation that works in any meeting app — plus AI meeting notes, transcription, and recording on paid plans. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Krisp when removing background noise on calls matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Krisp is from $8/mo (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Standout feature
AI meeting notes
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Team usage
Transcription
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Integrations
Accent conversion
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Languages & capture
AI noise cancellation
System and browser-tab audio capture
Best-fit workflow
AI meeting notes
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Best for
Krisp
Choose Krisp if you need removing background noise on calls — strengths include best-in-class ai noise, voice, and echo cancellation.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Pros & cons
Krisp
+ Best-in-class AI noise, voice, and echo cancellation
+ Works at the device level across virtually any meeting or calling app
- Free plan limits noise cancellation to 60 minutes per day
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
FAQ
Is Krisp or Speakr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Krisp is strong for removing background noise on calls, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Krisp and Speakr compare on price?
Krisp is from $8/mo and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Krisp and Speakr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.