Koji and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Koji
Typist
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.