Koji and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Automatic capture and transcription |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Koji
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.