Koji and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Koji
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.