Koji and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Skribby |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet |
| Standout feature | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts |
| Team usage | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) |
| Integrations | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events |
| Languages & capture | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Koji
Skribby
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.