Koji and Simmie are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Simmie: AI sales roleplay platform where reps practice realistic buyer conversations and get automated scoring and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Simmie when onboarding new sales reps with repeatable practice scenarios before live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scaleAI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a briefAutomatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
AI sales roleplay platform where reps practice realistic buyer conversations and get automated scoring and coaching.
Access via web, ChatGPT, Claude, Slack, and Microsoft Teams (MCP)AI coaching layer with post-call feedback and drill assignmentsAI roleplay with realistic personas that push back and adapt
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Simmie is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes
AI roleplay with realistic personas that push back and adapt
Standout feature
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale
Automated scoring of every conversation against a configurable rubric
Team usage
AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief
AI coaching layer with post-call feedback and drill assignments
Integrations
Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Scenario builder that converts scripts, playbooks, and recordings into practice
Languages & capture
Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations
Access via web, ChatGPT, Claude, Slack, and Microsoft Teams (MCP)
Best-fit workflow
MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion
Manager dashboards for rep readiness and skill gaps
Best for
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Simmie
Choose Simmie if you need onboarding new sales reps with repeatable practice scenarios before live calls — strengths include lets reps practice objection handling and discovery on demand without a manager.
Pros & cons
Koji
+ Removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously
- AI-moderated async format is less suited to deep rapport-driven live interviews
Simmie
+ Lets reps practice objection handling and discovery on demand without a manager
+ Consistent rubric-based scoring across the whole team
- Credit-based pricing (per minute of simulation) may be hard to predict for heavy users
FAQ
Is Koji or Simmie better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Simmie is strong for onboarding new sales reps with repeatable practice scenarios before live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Koji and Simmie compare on price?
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Simmie is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Koji and Simmie?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.