Koji and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Koji
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.