Koji and Sally are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Sally: German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Sally when german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Sally |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Joins Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex meetings to record and transcribe |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Strong German-language transcription including dialect handling, plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Automatic summaries with action item and decision extraction and assignment |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Meeting analytics such as speaker talk time |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Integrations with CRM and collaboration tools (HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana) |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Offline/uploaded audio file transcription for in-person meetings |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Sally
Choose Sally if you need german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items — strengths include optimized for german language and dialects, useful for german-speaking organizations.
Koji
Sally
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Sally is strong for german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.