Koji and Riverside are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Riverside: Browser-based podcast and video recording studio with AI transcription, captions, and text-based editing that also handles interviews and remote meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Riverside when transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
Browser-based podcast and video recording studio with AI transcription, captions, and text-based editing that also handles interviews and remote meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Riverside is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Riverside |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | AI-generated transcripts with automatic speaker detection and labeling |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Transcription support across more than 100 languages |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Caption and subtitle export in SRT and VTT formats |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Text-based editing that lets users cut and rearrange recordings by editing the transcript |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Local high-quality recording of each participant's audio and video track |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | AI clip generation for short-form social video |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Riverside
Choose Riverside if you need transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews — strengths include records each participant locally, producing cleaner audio and video than typical call recording.
Koji
Riverside
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Riverside is strong for transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Riverside is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.