Koji and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scaleAI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a briefAutomatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights.
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email draftsAI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query toolCall scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Koji
+ Removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Koji or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Koji and Rafiki compare on price?
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Koji and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Koji vs Rafiki: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo