Koji and PrismaScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. PrismaScribe: AI transcription tool that converts interviews, meetings, podcasts and lectures into text with multi-speaker labeling and many export formats. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and PrismaScribe when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI transcription tool that converts interviews, meetings, podcasts and lectures into text with multi-speaker labeling and many export formats.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); PrismaScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | PrismaScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | AI transcription of uploaded audio and video files |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Speaker identification and labeling for multiple speakers |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Transcription and translation across many languages with auto-detection |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Support for a wide range of audio and video formats |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Faster-than-real-time processing speed |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Export to TXT, SRT, VTT, PDF, Word and Markdown |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
PrismaScribe
Choose PrismaScribe if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers — strengths include strong multi-speaker and multilingual handling for research-style recordings.
Koji
PrismaScribe
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while PrismaScribe is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and PrismaScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.