Koji and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scaleAI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a briefAutomatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale
58-language transcription
Standout feature
AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief
AI summaries
Team usage
Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
File upload transcription
Integrations
Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion
AI summaries
Best for
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Koji
+ Removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously
- AI-moderated async format is less suited to deep rapport-driven live interviews
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Koji or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Koji and Notta compare on price?
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Koji and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.