Koji and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Note67 |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | Local on-device transcription using Whisper |
| Standout feature | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama |
| Team usage | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | Captures both microphone and system audio |
| Integrations | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants |
| Languages & capture | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Koji
Note67
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.