Koji and MeetingNotes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. MeetingNotes: Chrome extension that joins browser-based Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls to provide real-time transcription and a structured AI summary afterward. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and MeetingNotes when solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scaleAI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a briefAutomatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Chrome extension that joins browser-based Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls to provide real-time transcription and a structured AI summary afterward.
AI chat to search and ask questions across captured meetingsChrome extension for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft TeamsHighlights of key insights, decisions, and action items
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); MeetingNotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale
Chrome extension for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams
Standout feature
AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief
Real-time transcription during the meeting
Team usage
Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Structured AI summary generated automatically after the meeting
Integrations
Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations
Highlights of key insights, decisions, and action items
Languages & capture
Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes
AI chat to search and ask questions across captured meetings
Best-fit workflow
MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion
Installed and run directly from the Chrome Web Store
Best for
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
MeetingNotes
Choose MeetingNotes if you need solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams — strengths include lightweight, browser-based setup with no separate desktop app.
Pros & cons
Koji
+ Removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously
- AI-moderated async format is less suited to deep rapport-driven live interviews
MeetingNotes
+ Lightweight, browser-based setup with no separate desktop app
+ Summaries available immediately when the meeting ends
- Capture is tied to meetings run in the Chrome browser
FAQ
Is Koji or MeetingNotes better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while MeetingNotes is strong for solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Koji and MeetingNotes compare on price?
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and MeetingNotes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Koji and MeetingNotes?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.