Koji and Lark Minutes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. Lark Minutes: The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most, and Lark Minutes when lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
The AI meeting transcription and notes feature within the Lark productivity suite, turning video meetings into searchable transcripts with summaries.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Koji | Lark Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes | Automatic transcription of video meetings into searchable transcripts |
| Standout feature | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale | AI-generated meeting summaries via Lark's AI Meeting Notes |
| Team usage | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief | Collaborative transcripts with comments and emoji reactions on specific parts |
| Integrations | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment | One-click translation of meeting minutes between languages |
| Languages & capture | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations | Playback controls including custom speed and silence skipping |
| Best-fit workflow | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion | Integrated within the Lark suite alongside calendar, chat, and documents |
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Lark Minutes
Choose Lark Minutes if you need lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings — strengths include built into the lark productivity suite, keeping notes with calendar and docs.
Koji
Lark Minutes
It depends on your workflow. Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls, while Lark Minutes is strong for lark users transcribing and summarizing internal video meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades and Lark Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.